AUMdb

Vaughan Nelson Investment Management, L.P.

SEC-registered Investment Adviser · Large ($10B–$100B) CRD 106975 · SEC file 801-51795 · Houston, TX · WWW.LINKEDIN.COM
☆ Save with Pro ADV data as of Mar 30, 2026
Regulatory AUM
$12.2B
Discretionary
$12.2B
Clients
379
Avg AUM / client
$32.3M
Accounts
379
Employees
53

AUM over time

$7.3B $15.9B
Dec 2011 Dec 2025

Annual snapshots from Form ADV filings · as of Mar 30, 2026

Investments (13F portfolio — 208 positions, $11,309,405,440)

13F period Jun 30, 2026
#IssuerClassValueShares% of 13F% of AUM
1 Nvidia Corp COMMON $336,505,959 1,681,773 2.98% 2.75%
2 Eli Lilly & Co COMMON $286,082,046 238,515 2.53% 2.34%
3 Alphabet Inc Cl A COMMON $284,847,834 797,067 2.52% 2.33%
4 Taiwan Semiconductor Sp Adr ADR $230,948,077 483,590 2.04% 1.89%
5 Apple Inc COMMON $209,781,371 724,984 1.85% 1.71%
6 Monolithic Power Systems Inc COMMON $200,406,257 144,974 1.77% 1.64%
7 Ishares Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Exchange Traded Funds $193,992,179 876,999 1.72% 1.58%
8 Cummins Inc COMMON $183,953,263 257,923 1.63% 1.5%
9 Nucor Corp COMMON $166,575,792 747,815 1.47% 1.36%
10 Amazon.Com Inc COMMON $166,494,075 698,557 1.47% 1.36%
11 Eaton Corp Plc COMMON $164,443,970 385,910 1.45% 1.34%
12 Valmont Industries COMMON $142,931,741 247,458 1.26% 1.17%
13 United Rentals Inc COMMON $141,235,131 124,668 1.25% 1.15%
14 Sanmina Corp COMMON $138,365,163 546,725 1.22% 1.13%
15 Exxon Mobil Corp COMMON $132,179,804 966,792 1.17% 1.08%
16 Jp Morgan Chase & Co COMMON $132,001,061 403,266 1.17% 1.08%
17 Applied Materials COMMON $125,567,025 173,675 1.11% 1.03%
18 Sensient Technologies COMMON $124,580,107 1,010,464 1.1% 1.02%
19 Cushman & Wakefield Plc COMMON $123,900,589 9,253,218 1.1% 1.01%
20 Schwab Charles Corp COMMON $123,378,369 1,337,145 1.09% 1.01%
21 Carlisle Cos Inc COMMON $122,702,727 338,257 1.09% 1.0%
22 Visa Inc Class A Shrs COMMON $121,477,877 354,070 1.07% 0.99%
23 Revvity COMMON $120,187,725 1,080,242 1.06% 0.98%
24 Moog Inc Cl A COMMON $120,092,945 283,345 1.06% 0.98%
25 Gatx Corp COMMON $113,915,451 642,900 1.01% 0.93%

Top 25 of 208 positions from the manager's latest Form 13F · source filing (EDGAR) ↗. 13F covers long US-listed positions only. "% of AUM" is share of the firm's total regulatory AUM (Form ADV Item 5.F).

Who they serve

Client typeClientsAUM% of AUM
Individuals (non-high net worth) 15 $25.8M 0.21%
High net worth individuals 155 $461M 3.77%
Banking or thrift institutions 0 $0
Investment companies 13 $4.8B 39.4%
Pooled investment vehicles (non-investment companies) 9 $611M 4.99%
Pension and profit sharing plans 19 $743M 6.07%
Charitable organizations 75 $971M 7.93%
State or municipal government entities 13 $628M 5.13%
Other investment advisers 9 $1.1B 9.16%
Insurance companies 8 $559M 4.57%
Sovereign wealth funds and foreign official institutions 0 $0
Corporations and other businesses 63 $2.3B 18.8%
Other 0 $0

Private funds (1)

Reported in Form ADV Section 7.B.(1), filing of Jun 2024 · $3.2M combined gross assets

FundTypeDomicileGross assetsOwners
Vnim09 Other Private Fund Texas $3.2M 11

Nonprofit clients

Charities that reported this firm as a top-paid contractor (investment services) on Form 990.

Charity Location Period
Hospice Endowment Trust Fund Of Phoenix Arizona EIN 942856701 Phoenix, AZ 09/30/2024

Retirement plan clients

Plans that reported this firm as an investment service provider on Form 5500 Schedule C.

Plan Location Plan year
Walmart 401(k) Plan Walmart Inc. 2024
Hunt Consolidated, Inc. Fidelity Pension Plan Hunt Consolidated, Inc. 2024
Finra Employees Retirement Plan Finra 2024
The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. Pension Plan The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA 2024

People (11)

roster as of Jul 20, 2026
NameRole / titleCredentialsWith firm sinceOwnership
Christopher David Wallis Director, Ceo & Cio CFA Nov 2002 (24y) Less than 5%
Giunta, David, Lawrence Director May 2013 (13y) Less than 5%
Orfanos, James, Theodore Director Feb 2017 (10y) Less than 5%
Psaledakis, Steven President Dec 2017 (9y) Less than 5%
Gonzalez, Carlos Chief Compliance Officer Mar 2022 (4y) Less than 5%
Sloan, Nathan, Elliot Chief Operating Officer Sep 2023 (3y) Less than 5%
Mark Edward Farrell Registered representative Dec 2000 (26y)
Scott Jackson Weber Registered representative CFA Nov 2003 (23y)
Dennis G. Alff Registered representative CFA Jan 2008 (19y)
Danika Haselden Wilkinson Registered representative Aug 2017 (9y)
Matthew Etienne Caire Registered representative CFP CFA Jan 2024 (3y)

Entity owners (Schedule A/B)

EntityTitle / statusSinceSch.Ownership
Natixis Investment Managers, Llc Limited Partner Of Applicant Jan 2024 A 75% or more
Vaughan Nelson Investment Management, Inc. General Partner Apr 1996 A Less than 5%
Natixis Investment Managers Shareholder Aug 2004 B ≈ 42.19% – 100% via Natixis Investment Managers Participations 1
Natixis Investment Managers, Llc Shareholder Jan 2024 B ≈ 0% – 5% via Vaughan Nelson Investment Management, Inc.
Natixis Investment Managers Participations 1 Member Jun 2005 B ≈ 56.25% – 100% via Natixis Investment Managers, Llc
Natixis Shareholder Sep 2011 B ≈ 31.64% – 100% via Natixis Investment Managers
Bpce Shareholder Jul 2009 B ≈ 23.73% – 100% via Natixis

Undisclosed: 0% – 25% of the firm is not attributable from the filed Schedule A bands.

Estimated effective ownership (look-through of filed bands):

  • Natixis Investment Managers: 75% – 100% of Natixis Investment Managers Participations 1 × 75% – 100% of Natixis Investment Managers, Llc × 75% – 100% direct ≈ 42.19% – 100% of the firm
  • Natixis Investment Managers, Llc: 75% – 100% of Vaughan Nelson Investment Management, Inc. × 0% – 5% direct ≈ 0% – 5% of the firm
  • Natixis Investment Managers Participations 1: 75% – 100% of Natixis Investment Managers, Llc × 75% – 100% direct ≈ 56.25% – 100% of the firm
  • Natixis: 75% – 100% of Natixis Investment Managers × 75% – 100% of Natixis Investment Managers Participations 1 × 75% – 100% of Natixis Investment Managers, Llc × 75% – 100% direct ≈ 31.64% – 100% of the firm
  • Bpce: 75% – 100% of Natixis × 75% – 100% of Natixis Investment Managers × 75% – 100% of Natixis Investment Managers Participations 1 × 75% – 100% of Natixis Investment Managers, Llc × 75% – 100% direct ≈ 23.73% – 100% of the firm

Roster from the IAPD representatives feed; ownership and acquisition dates from Form ADV Schedule A/B. "Since" is the earliest filed registration or acquisition date.

Private funds (1, $3.2M gross assets)

FundTypeGross assetsMin. investmentOwners
Vnim09 Other Private Fund $3.2M $50.0K 11

From Form ADV Section 7.B private fund reporting.

Retirement plans served (4)

PlanSponsorParticipantsPlan assetsAs of
Walmart 401(k) Plan Walmart Inc. 1,670,732 $50.8B 02/01/2024
Hunt Consolidated, Inc. Fidelity Pension Plan Hunt Consolidated, Inc. 202 $222M 01/01/2024
Finra Employees Retirement Plan Finra 1,065 $535M 01/01/2024
The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. Pension Plan The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. 51,855 $5.5B 01/01/2024

From Form 5500 service-provider disclosures.

Foundations & charities (1)

OrganizationTypeAssetsAs of
Hospice Endowment Trust Fund Of Phoenix Arizona Public charity $816M 09/30/2024

From IRS Form 990 investment-management-fee disclosures.

Documents (1 archived)

FormPeriodSize
Form ADV (full filing) 03/30/2026 1.9 MB View · PDF · Source ↗

Archived copies of the firm's regulatory filings, versioned by content hash.

Disciplinary disclosures

Criminal · Item 11.A(1) as of Jun 28, 2024

Event Detail: 1. ONE COUNT 2. FELONY 3. NOT GUILTY 4. N/A - CHARGE RELATES TO AN ISSUER PRESS RELEASE Status: On Appeal Disposition: (A) CONVICTED (B) 05/07/2024 (C) FINE (D) N/A (E) N/A (F) 2,000,000 EUROS (APPROXIMATELY $2.17 MILLION) FINE ON APPEAL AND JUST UNDER 2,000,000 EUROS (APPROXIMATELY $2.39 MILLION AT THE TIME) IN PRIVATE CIVIL DAMAGES (G) N/A. PAYMENT OF THE CRIMINAL FINE IS NOT DUE UNTIL THE APPEAL PROCESS IS COMPLETED. Summary: ON JUNE 24, 2021, NATIXIS SA ("NATIXIS"), THE FRENCH BANK THAT OWNS OUR PARENT COMPANY, WAS FOUND GUILTY BY A FRENCH CRIMINAL COURT (TRIBUNAL CORRECTIONNEL DE PARIS) OF COMMUNICATING MISLEADING INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC, BASED ON LANGUAGE REGARDING NATIXIS' EXPOSURE TO THE SUB-PRIME CRISIS IN A 2007 PRESS RELEASE. THE FRENCH COURT ORDERED NATIXIS TO PAY A FINE OF 7.5 MILLION EUROS. IN ADDITION, THE COURT AWARDED JUST UNDER 2 MILLION EUROS TO CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS THAT HAD IN 2009 REQUESTED THE OPENING OF THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. NO OFFICERS, DIRECTORS OR EMPLOYEES OF NATIXIS OR OF ITS AFFILIATES WERE CHARGED IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROCEEDING. ON JUNE 25, 2021, NATIXIS FILED A TIMELY APPEAL TO THE PARIS COURT OF APPEAL (COUR D'APPEL DE PARIS). UNDER APPEAL, THE CASE WAS ENTIRELY REEXAMINED ON MATTERS OF BOTH FACTS AND LAW. ON MAY 7, 2024, NATIXIS WAS FOUND GUILTY BY THE PARIS COURT APPEAL. THE COURT REDUCED THE CRIMINAL FINE AGAINST NATIXIS TO 2 MILLION EUROS. THE COURT AWARDED APPROXIMATELY 2 MILLION EUROS IN PRIVATE CIVIL DAMAGES TO CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS, THE MAJORITY OF WHICH HAD ALREADY BEEN PAID BY NATIXIS AFTER THE FIRST INSTANCE DECISION. THE PRESS RELEASE IN QUESTION WAS ISSUED BY NATIXIS IN NOVEMBER 2007 AT THE START OF THE FINANCIAL CRISIS. AT ISSUE IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDING WAS A SHORT PARAGRAPH OF THE PRESS RELEASE, RELATING TO NATIXIS' EXPOSURE TO THE SUBPRIME CRISIS AND RELATED RISKS. NEITHER THE PREVIOUS NOR THE SUBSEQUENT COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ISSUER RELATING TO THE SUBPRIME CRISIS WERE FOUND TO BE MISLEADING BY THE PARIS COURT OF APPEAL. THE CONVICTION RESULTED FROM AN INVESTIGATION LAUNCHED IN 2009 BY THE PARIS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE INTO A COMPLAINT FILED BY CERTAIN MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS OF NATIXIS COORDINATED BY THE ASSOCIATION TO DEFEND MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS RIGHTS (ASSOCIATION DE DÉFENSE DES ACTIONNAIRES MINORITAIRES - ADAM), WHICH ARE THE PLAINTIFFS THAT RECEIVED THE APPROXIMATELY 2 MILLION EUROS AWARD REFERENCED ABOVE. THE ASPECTS OF THE PRESS RELEASE CONSIDERED BY THE CRIMINAL COURT HAD BEEN INDEPENDENTLY ASSESSED BY NATIXIS' PRIMARY REGULATOR, THE FRENCH FINANCIAL MARKETS AUTHORITY (THE AUTORITÉ DES MARCHÉS FINANCIERS OR "AMF"), WHICH DECLINED TO TAKE ANY ACTION AGAINST NATIXIS. THE PRESS RELEASE IN QUESTION DID NOT RELATE TO ANY OF NATIXIS' SUBSIDIARY BUSINESSES ENGAGED IN ADVISORY OR BROKER-DEALER ACTIVITIES. NATIXIS CONTINUES TO MAINTAIN THAT THE INFORMATION IT DISSEMINATED IN THE PRESS RELEASE IN QUESTION WAS APPROPRIATE TO THE SITUATION. THE PRESS RELEASE WAS ISSUED AT THE BEGINNING OF THE SUBPRIME CRISIS WHEN THE EXTENT AND CONSEQUENCES OF THE CRISIS WERE NOT YET WIDELY UNDERSTOOD EITHER BY MARKET PARTICIPANTS OR BY REGULATORS. MOREOVER, AT THE TIME OF THE PRESS RELEASE, NATIXIS WAS VERY RECENTLY CREATED AND STILL IN THE COURSE OF A MERGER. THE COURT OF APPEAL RECOGNIZED SUCH DIFFICULT CONTEXT AS A FACTOR REDUCING THE BANK'S LIABILITY. NATIXIS HAS FILED AN APPEAL BEFORE THE FRENCH SUPREME COURT (COUR DE CASSATION). PURSUANT TO THE APPEAL, THE CASE WILL BE REEXAMINED ON MATTERS OF LAW. UNDER FRENCH LAW, OTHER THAN THE IMPOSITION OF THE MONETARY FINE, THERE ARE NO LEGAL CONSEQUENCES TO NATIXIS OR ITS AFFILIATES FOR A GUILTY VERDICT IN THIS CASE.

Regulatory as of Jun 28, 2024

Allegations: THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION ISSUED AN ORDER FILING AND SETTLING CHARGES AGAINST NATIXIS, A GLOBAL BANK AND SWAP DEALER, FOR FAILURE TO DILIGENTLY SUPERVISE TWO TRADERS ON THE BANK'S NEW YORK-BASED INTEREST RATE DERIVATIVES DESK (IRD DESK) AND ITS EQUITY DERIVATIVES FLOW AND SOLUTION TRADING DESK (FAST DESK). THE TRADERS ON THE IRD DESK AND FAST DESK SEPARATELY ENGAGED IN MISCONDUCT BY MISMARKING THEIR POSITIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF EITHER INFLATING PROFITS AND MINIMIZING LOSSES, OR TO "SMOOTH" OUT RETURNS, RESPECTIVELY. THE ORDER REQUIRES NATIXIS TO PAY A $2.8 MILLION CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY, CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT (CEA) AND CFTC REGULATIONS, AND COMPLY WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS AND UNDERTAKINGS. CASE BACKGROUND BETWEEN JANUARY 2015 AND AT LEAST APRIL 2018, A TRADER ON THE BANK'S IRD DESK SUBMITTED FALSE OR MISLEADING ENTRIES IN THE BANK'S INTERNAL RECORDKEEPING AND ACCOUNTING SYSTEM RELATING TO THE MARKING OF THE END-OF-DAY USD LIBOR FORWARD CURVE (CLOSING CURVE), FOR THE PURPOSE OF INFLATING THE UNREALIZED PROFIT AND LOSS (P&L) OF THE DESK HE MANAGED AND DISGUISING SIGNIFICANT TRADING LOSSES. SPECIFICALLY, THE TRADER ENGAGED IN A PATTERN OF MARKING THE CLOSING CURVE IN A MANNER THAT VARIED FROM OBSERVED BROKER MID PRICES AND IN A MANNER THAT ALIGNED WITH THE RISK POSITIONS OF THE IRD DESK, WHILE GENERALLY STAYING WITHIN THE LIMITS OF INTERNAL CONTROLS DESIGNED TO DETECT MISMARKING. ALTHOUGH NATIXIS MAINTAINED CERTAIN CONTROLS RELATING TO THE MARKING OF THE CLOSING CURVE, THOSE CONTROLS WERE INSUFFICIENT TO DETECT THE TRADER'S MISCONDUCT FOR OVER THREE YEARS. AT ITS PEAK IN EARLY 2018, THE TRADER'S MISMARKING OF THE CLOSING CURVE OVERSTATED THE P&L OF THE IRD DESK BY APPROXIMATELY $25 MILLION. IN ADDITION, THE ORDER FURTHER FINDS THAT NATIXIS FAILED TO DILIGENTLY SUPERVISE THE ACTIVITIES OF ITS FAST DESK. SPECIFICALLY, BETWEEN FEBRUARY 2017 AND NOVEMBER 2019, TRADERS ON THE FAST DESK MADE CERTAIN MANUAL ADJUSTMENTS TO THE BANK'S INTERNAL TRADE BOOKING SYSTEMS FOR THE PURPOSE OF "SMOOTHING" OR HIDING THE FAST DESK'S P&L AND LATER RELEASING THE P&L DURING DIFFICULT MARKET CONDITIONS. AT ITS PEAK, THE P&L SMOOTHING UNDERSTATED THE UNREALIZED P&L OF THE FAST DESK BY OVER $6 MILLION. THIS MISCONDUCT RENDERED THE BANK'S BOOKS AND RECORDS INACCURATE. IN ACCEPTING THE BANK'S OFFER OF SETTLEMENT, THE CFTC RECOGNIZED ITS SUBSTANTIAL COOPERATION DURING THE DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT'S INVESTIGATION OF THIS MATTER. THE CFTC NOTED THAT THE BANK'S SUBSTANTIAL COOPERATION AND REMEDIATION ARE RECOGNIZED IN THE FORM OF A REDUCED CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY. Status: Final Sanction Detail: N/A Summary: SEE RESPONSE TO QUESTION 7. ALSO SEE: HTTPS://WWW.CFTC.GOV/PRESSROOM/PRESSRELEASES/8581-22

Disclosure text reproduced verbatim from the firm's own Form ADV filings.

How they charge

  • Percentage of assets under management
  • Performance-based fees

Services

  • Portfolio management for individuals/small businesses
  • Portfolio management for investment companies
  • Portfolio management for pooled investment vehicles
  • Portfolio management for businesses/institutional clients

Custody

Reported custodians

Amounts as reported in ADV Item 5.K.(3) (custodians holding 10%+ of SMA assets).

Firm reports it does not have custody of client funds or securities (Item 9.A).

Source

All data on this page comes from this firm's Form ADV filings, reproduced without modification. Latest filing: Mar 30, 2026.

View current Form ADV (SEC/IAPD) ↗